I’m so glad this system did not work - Sound Crazy?
Let me explain ...
I like roulette although I am not a high roller. I play reasonably frequently for low stakes. I am always interested in systems and respect the work the owners put into developing and testing them. I have bought a few and they all have been worth it for the fun factor and that they give the punter an edge.
So I was happy enough to buy into this system and give it a try. After receiving the ‘Invincible Roulette Strategy’ single zero roulette system information, I used it several times and it always worked for me. I got the cost of the system back on the 1st game I played, and it has been all positive since.
Now here is the really interesting thing. I always play on a single zero table. I was overseas on a short trip, and visited the local casino. Without thinking, I played using this roulette system and lost. Accepting once in a while a loss could occur I played again and lost again. That started me thinking this is just another one of those hair brained systems that isn’t really much better than random odds. Then I realized I was using the invincible roulette system on a double zero table. So why am I glad I lost? Because, of course my version of this invincible roulette strategy will not work on a double zero table.
As soon as I got home I used it again on a single zero table and I’m back in business; I continue to do well and am making good profits. This experience shows this system really does have merit. Aside from the fact it works for me I especially like the capped betting. If I am honest I really get nervous outlaying over $400, chasing a losing sequence to just end up $5.00 up (as some systems advocate). The low chip outlay really appeals to me and the returns come quick enough that I can make some good money quickly even on the smallest stakes.
Try this. If you are a bit more serious than me place some larger chips out there. It’s working for me and its fun.
Cheers Mike
The team asked me to do a brief note on how I
thought the Invincible Roulette Strategy
game play was going so…
...of course it would be wrong of me to write a testimonial after only a few visits to the casino, so I rectified that by making a few more.
Made a mistake though, by playing during my lunch break once and, due to the time, had to call it quits and go back to work. During the short session I ended up going down about 80 units before clawing back to minus 48 units when I left. My fault and lesson learned. (Allow enough time to finish a session)
Not being happy about the situation I went to the casino again the next night and I got my money back…
Happy again.
Thanks - John.
When it comes to roulette I know what it’s like to win,
and I know what it’s like to lose.
I also know what it’s like to walk up to a table with a new ‘can’t-lose’ system and then watch all my chips get taken away spin after spin until that nice shiny pile of discs in front of me has reduced to a few lonesome singles.
It’s not a great feeling. It’s bad enough losing at the table, but when I add to that the ‘I’ve been suckered again’ sensation swimming through my stomach, it’s enough to make a gal want to quit.
Trouble is I like this dang game. So when one of the team said ‘try this new Invincible Roulette Strategy out for us, I think it’s a winner’, I took one look at his face, saw how excited he was and, in spite of all the ‘winning’ systems I’ve tried before which have always failed - I was willing to give this one a try.
Why? Because it was simple, for one thing. No complicated formulas to remember, no watching the wheel and trying to pick patterns; no second-guessing the croupier’s signature.
Second, there was no need to increase the bet when on a losing streak unlike some other systems I’ve tried where I’ve begun with one chip and had to double up to 120: and still lost.
Feeling both cynical and hopeful about this new simple roulette strategy, I headed down to the tables and bought 30 chips. First spin I put out my chips and I won. Feeling that was a pretty good start, I placed my second bet and won again. Well okay. This was the way roulette ought to go, in my book.
My next bet I lost, and the next, but I won three in a row after that. I played on for another fifteen or twenty minutes and doubled my stake. Hardly able to believe my luck, I cashed up and headed off to a quiet corner of the casino bar to analyse the figures. They all stacked up.
When I finished my coffee, I headed off for another table. I was going to test this again! I placed my first bet and lost. Placed my second bet and lost. Placed my third bet and lost.
Uh-oh. This all seemed too familiar. The lucky start, followed by the losing streak. Three spins and a half of my chips were gone. But I persisted, and put out my chips for the fourth spin. My number came up. I lost on the fifth spin, won on the sixth, won on the seventh, won on the eighth. Lost a couple more bets along the way, but was winning steadily, and frequently. The piles of chips in front of me started growing. A couple of the other punters were giving me sideways glances, and one guy started to copy my betting.
At that point I scanned my pile of chips properly and realised that in about 45 minutes I had more than tripled my stake. More than tripled. Wow. I cashed up again, and headed back to my quiet corner at the bar.
I’ve played this system quite a few times now and my worst result has been a break even. It’s simple, it’s fun, and it’s let me walk out of the casino with that winning feeling.
What more could a punter ask for? Let’s face it. It’s no fun playing roulette when you’re losing. But if you’re winning, it’s the best.